Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ

Welcome
Welcome to ANIMALS SPEAK

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features.

By joining our free community, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content, and access many other special features and private boards only accessible to registered members, such as the CHAT BOARD we have at the top of the forum for Registered users. .

Registration is fast, simple, and absolutely free !

Note: Once approved, you will receive a Welcome Email from us, so PLEASE make sure your email is correct, or it will be returned to us as undeliverable, at which time your account will no longer be accessible, until you contact us with a working email. Once you do that we will re-activate your account once again.

So please, click here to join our community. We are sure you will enjoy it here!

Board index » FEEDING OUR PETS » The Pet Food Industry » Industry magazines and News Articles




 Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ] 



Author Message
 Post subject: 2008-07-31 PFI Defeats California Pet Food Labeling Bill
 New post Posted: Wed Sep 17, 2008 6:11 pm 
Offline
SITE ADMIN
SITE ADMIN
User avatar

Joined: Mon Sep 24, 2007 8:35 pm
Posts: 1033
SOURCE:http://petindustrynews.tblog.com/post/1970007981

PFI Defeats California Pet Food Labeling Bill
07.31.08 (2:31 pm) [edit]
PFI defeats California bill, Minnesota "Recipe" bill dies

The Pet Food Institute (PFI), worked closely with the California Manufacturers and Technology Association and Grocery Manufacturers Association, to defeat a proposal in California, USA that would have required a telephone number and country of origin information on pet food labels. The bill SB 1773 was authored by Senator Corbett and initially would have required that country of origin information for all pet food ingredients be listed on labels. Later the bill was amended to require that country of information be listed on company Web sites, another requirement that PFI opposed.

In California, bills estimated to cost the state more than US$50,000 per year undergo an additional approval process in the Appropriations Committee called suspense. PFI and ally organizations convinced the Appropriations Committee through strategic lobbying and information provided that the cost of the bill would be significantly higher than the threshold, thus detaining the bill in the suspense process. The Appropriations Committee reviewed the bills authored by Senator Corbett and decided not to release SB 1773. There is still a bill in California - PFI calls it "problematic" - that would ban the use of perfluorochemicals, substances often used as a grease barrier in multi-wall packaging, that is progressing through the legislative process. PFI is currently working with a coalition to oppose the bill.

In other US bills affecting the pet food industry news, Minnesota HF 5318, a bill to require that pet food companies register product recipes with the state for pet foods sold only in packages of 10 pounds or less, died when the legislature body adjourned for the year. PFI is still seeking to determine whether the proposal is backed by the Minnesota Department of Agriculture and will monitor future legislative activity in Minnesota for any similar proposals.

_________________
GUESTS: To Post-Please
REGISTER HERE --> http://tinyurl.com/6yv32b

LetsTalkPetFoods@gmail.com
www.AnimalsSpeak.org
http://letstalkpetfoods.wordpress.com/


Top 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
 
 Page 1 of 1 [ 1 post ] 




Board index » FEEDING OUR PETS » The Pet Food Industry » Industry magazines and News Articles


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to: